• 28Apr

    Here are my random thoughts and what I have learned so far (mainly through reading Bruce Fraser, Fred Bunting and Chris Murphy’s book on “Real World Color Management” and numerous web resources and discussions with friends. Insights are welcomed and appreciated.

    Color confidence and color reproducibility across different devices depends on a combination of (1) using an accurate and reliable calibrator/profiler and (2) the capability and limitations of the monitor itself (e.g., is it calibratable and to what extent – RGB voltages, contrast, luminance; What is the gamut size/color space, LCD versus CRT, and how the monitor is ‘calibrated’ – LUT only, in hardware). But realizing this is not enough to solve my current color issues — the same image still looks different depending on the monitor that I am using – even if they are calibrated and profiled with the same device and in the same environment (light conditions). I do have LCD monitors (MacBook Pro with a LED backlight display – GeForce graphics card and a Power Mac G4 with a Cinema HD monitor – ATI graphic card).

    For example, consider a photo of my daughter playing in our backyard where the backdrop is green foliage (see here). In one display the foliage is displayed as lime green, vivid and almost a nuclear green, while in another the background is rendered in a calm pleasing avocado green. Skin tones in one monitor look red and flushed in one but in another I see a yellow cast (around her right ear area). Lips look magenta in one and a rusty red in another. Brightness varies as well (e.g., blown highlights in hair in one display but not in another). This image is on flickr and has been converted to the sRGB color space I am viewing my images via color managed – Safari or Ominweb browsers (I have also tried firefox -unmanaged – browsers).

    I am curious where my problem is, and how I can solve it. Is the problem my calibrator and profiler system or is it the limitation of my monitors – or is it, can it be, the catchall: an operator problem?

    How do I know which monitor shows correct color? Is it possible to know?

    If I had a reliable calibrator/profiler system enabling transformation to and from a device independent system such CIE XYZ or LAB will the image look similar across different devices even if one monitor is not as capable? How do I know which monitor is closer to showing accurate color, how do I know if the calibrator is faulty?
    I have a Spyder2Pro (a hardware calibrator and profiler system) and it is supposedly accurate and reliable. I thought it would solve the color inconsistencies I have been seeing across my platforms both at home and work but I am still stuck with color inconsistencies.

    One thing I have discovered – for sure- is that people see the web with many different colored spectacles – and there is no way they see what you see ‘unless’ you are using the ’same’ reference system. You can, presumably, control your own environment, even if your calibrator/profiler uses the ‘wrong’ reference system – it then ensures, I suppose, that the monitor outputs are consistent among themselves (albeit consistently wrong). But I am not seeing that either – my output differ. So I cannot make any conclusions: – wether my monitors are faulty or not as capable? Or is my calibration system not reliable?

    So in conclusion: I think it is a combination of the capability of the monitor, its gamut, and the calibration system and right now I don’t trust my calibration system… help – I am getting deeper and deeper into the infinite depth of color spaces and I can’t get out.

  • 27Apr

    Color Management Woes

    Larger Image: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2314/2446212886_d7032f3faf_o.jpg

    Figure (created in Omnigraffle) – is part of a discussion that I am having with myself and others regarding color management :-D HELP!

    My laptop – calibrated and profiled with a Spyder2Pro
    My desktop – calibrated and profiled with a Spyder2Pro

    Possibly my Spyder2Pro is not generating the transformation consistently across different platforms. I calibrated both my laptop and workstation in the same room (same lighting conditions) but I am still not getting consistent results.

    Differences between monitors (that should be adjusted with a calibration / profile system ).

    • Contrast (my laptop has more contrast than my desktop)
    • Color shifts for certain colors- e.g., nuclear vivid green – looks avocado green on another.
    • Brightness – blown highlights – may not be blown in another monitor. Gamma should compensate for this – I use a gamma curve of 2.2 (it is a non-linear correction). More details here.
    • Overall temperature - this should be adjusted by the white point setting – here the photo itself may look OK while the display as a whole may have a cool feel to it. I use the same for all monitors and so far I have tried D50, D65, and the monitor’s ‘natural white point’. Here is description from Wikipedia.

    Resources:
    Norman Koren’s tutorial on Color Management.
    Gary Ballard’s site
    Andrew Rodney/Digital Dog (also check out his comprehensive book).
    Chris Murphy (co-author Real World Color Management).
    www.color.org/index.xalter International Color Consortium.
    www.color.org/version4html.xalter Is your system ICC Version 4 ready?
    www.apple.com/safari/”> Safari, a color managed browser for free (works on Vista).
    Firefox 3 BetaDoes now have a form of color management (Vista/ Mac).
    Rob Galbraith seems to think that the MacBook Pro LED-backlit display would help- but I may need an Eye-One Pro ($3,500) for this work (Right (: lol! $$ – I rather get a D3 before that and live with colorshifts).

    Wish List: EIZO CG211 or NEC 2490 – monitors optimized for the sRGB gamut. There are monitors for the wider gamut, aRGB, e.g., EIZO 221 and NEC 2690 with 93.4% coverage of aRGB (a wider gamut) – but sRGB is best for web work and gives you finer tonal control. So NEC 2490 is the most reasonable without much sacrifice in quality (if any) (: so it will be the one on my wish list.