• 30Jan
    Categories: Predictions Comments: 0

    I love making predictions and my predictions for 2009 are as follows:

    • Best Picture: Slumdog Millionaire, no contest.
    • Best Director: Danny Boyle (Slumdog Millionair).
    • Best Lead Actress: Close between Winslet (The Reader) and Streep (Doubt) – both are great actresses but the best is the one and only – Meryl Streep. She already won two Oscars and the Oscars don’t seem to like repeat winners. But the best should win.
    • Best Lead Actor: I am rooting for Rourke (The Wrestler), he is a ’strangely’ good (and weird) actor (e.g., his role in Angel Heart).  Penn (Milk) will be at his heals.
    • Best Supporting Actress: Penelope Cruz (Barcelona).
    • Best Supporting Actor: Heath Ledger (The Dark Knight) – what a fantastic performance. 
    What are your predictions/thoughts?
  • 12Jan

    It is time for an informal review – I had hoped to do a more thorough review but it is not happening.  I am just too busy with work, traveling, mothering and moving part of our household to the left coast (CA) – so this will have to do for now.

    I have tested both cameras – I initially rented the D700 in July/Aug of 2008 when it first came out and a couple a weeks ago I rented the 5D II.   I was considering becoming a bi-shooter, he he he – but that too is not happen.  There are different advantages of each camera (i.e., between a Canon FX and Nikon FX). I think it boils down to a responsive focus engine and resistance to noise [Nikon] OR better resolution and slightly better tonality [Canon].  Both camera manufacturers have great lenses –the 85 f/1.2L is outstanding (and I suspect also the 50 f/1.2L) for Canon, and on the Nikon side the 24-70 f/2.8 is fantastic & the 105 f/2.8 macro is WOW and so is the Nikon 14-24 f/2.8 zoom lens.

    So – if you look at just the image quality given perfect focus and exposure, Canon may have a slight edge (in terms of resolution & tonality) BUT in practice, when you have fast moving kids and/or pesky low light, the Nikon gives you an edge with its better ‘hit-rate’ due to its responsive focus engine and seemingly more resistance to noise. I also enjoy Nikon’s built in speed light system (CLS) – (e.g., I have the light weigt and far reaching SU-800 to trigger my off-camera lights (SB-800s). 

    And for me that (the focus engine) sealed the deal so I finally decided to upgrade to the D700 – wohooo (I did say this is an informal review). I do like both cameras, the video capability on the 5DII was nice to have – and I miss that – and I miss the 85 f/1.2 L lens… and the extra resolution was nice so I admit yes I want BOTH but no I don’t think it is worth it. But maybe I should try the D3X. Nikon please send me one.

    IN the end I recommend that anyone considering both should TRY both, maybe via rentals as I am sure it is a personal decision – so stop the suffering in wondering if one is better than the other (like I did).

    For me the D700 is the BEST – YEAH! 

     

    Canon 5D Mark II:
    Green on green

    Canon 5D Mark II:
    Pondering: What do I need for Christmas?

    Canon 5D Mark II (ISO 64,000):
    Just a quick check at ISO 6,400

     

    Nikon D700:
    Retro Swing

    Nikon D700:
    3, 2, 1, Blast Off!

    Nikon D700:
    "Come on in: Best Ribs &  Blues on Beale Street"